Scream 3

The killer draws Sidney to Miltons house with Gale and Dewey as hostages. He then chases Sidney before revealing himself.It's Sidney's long-lost brother, Roman Bridges, the director of Stab 3. He also claimed to have been the mastermind behind the murder of Sidney's mother, which was then the catalyst for Billy to start the killings in Scream! Roman shoots Sidney, supposedly killing her. Sidney then gets back up and stabs him revealing she was wearing a bulletproof vest. She stabs him three times. He then gets back up, seemingly invincible before Dewey puts a bullet in his head. Dewey proposes to Gale who accepts and Sidney lives happpily with Kincait supposedly living with her. Just before the movie ends a door swings open and Sidney smiles. The door suggests that they are literally leaving the door open for another sequel.

Continuity mistake: When Sidney is first going into the house for the end of the movie it is clear that she is not wearing the vest underneath her clothes and as she is walking around or when she is rolling on the ground fighting with her half brother you see her bellybutton but then she has the vest on and it goes over the belly button

More mistakes in Scream 3

Gale: Deja voodoo.

More quotes from Scream 3

Trivia: Like the other Scream films, in this movie there's a small part for the man himself, Wes Craven. He's the guy with the video camera walking by Jay and Silent Bob. He even takes a good look at the camera. (00:18:30)

Dragon
More trivia for Scream 3

Question: Is Detective Kincaid the second killer? Two pieces of evidence spring to mind that he could be. One, he borrows Dewey's phone and soon afterwards Sydney is rung up by the killer and two, Roman Bridger has a bulletproof vest.

Answer: Those are misdirects/red-herrings to make you suspect Kincaid. Not actual pieces of evidence. But Roman is confirmed to be the only killer in the film. Originally, there was going to be a second killer (as there is in the three other films), but the idea was dropped during production to change-up the formula slightly and keep audiences guessing.

So how could Roman call her in that moment?

Answer: No, remember, the detective says something along the lines of "In the third movie, all bets are off." Meaning that you can't expect the same formula (ie two killers) as the first two movies.

Grumpy Scot
More questions & answers from Scream 3

Join the mailing list

Separate from membership, this is to get updates about mistakes in recent releases. Addresses are not passed on to any third party, and are used solely for direct communication from this site. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Check out the mistake & trivia books, on Kindle and in paperback.