My Bloody Valentine

Question: I don't feel it warrants a plot hole because of technicalities (we never explicitly see him in two places at the same time), but don't you think the movie is very misleading about the identity of the killer? Every time we see a kill, the culprit is accounted for in a bit of a sneaky way. Mabel = he is chilling in a car with the others being very close. Murders at the party = he is drunk and morose, but also should be plotting the most elaborate murder. Also, he has no motive at all for how he acts (kills Happy, who is the only one who shows any respect to the killer), and, in fact, he is the one who tells everyone to run away from the party, saving a lot of lives. Just a case of "he's crazy," I guess? Normally, you'd show them having some sort of split personality or something like that to explain a bit of this erratic behaviour.

Sammo

Revealing mistake: During the fight between Harry and TG near the end, several times you can see when TG hits Harry that the spade bends. (01:21:15)

Ssiscool

More mistakes in My Bloody Valentine

Mayor Hanniger: If there's one thing I like better than Christmas candy, it's Valentine's candy.

More quotes from My Bloody Valentine

Trivia: The dog that chases the pick-up when it does a U-turn was just a random stray dog that was caught on film - you can see it was not a trained one because it does actually connect slightly with the vehicle, thankfully without harm (confirmed in the director's DVD commentary).

Sammo

More trivia for My Bloody Valentine