Joker: Folie à Deux

Trivia: SPOILERS: Director Todd Phillips has defended the controversial ending, in which it is revealed that Arthur is not the Joker who would go on to fight Batman when he is stabbed and killed by another inmate, who then carves a smile onto his face. Phillips noted that the two films were called "Joker," and not "THE Joker," and stated that Arthur was the person who inspired the real Joker—presumably the inmate who killed him. However, this explanation was poorly received by fans, who felt duped.

TedStixon

Trivia: The first film garnered the most Academy Award nominations of any film from 2019, with eleven, winning two. By contrast, this film received the most Razzie nominations of any film from 2024, with seven, likewise winning two.

Phaneron

Trivia: Despite the first film being a billion-dollar hit, within days of opening, "Joker: Folie à Deux" was already considered a bomb. Its domestic total was less than the first film's domestic opening weekend, and by the start of its fourth weekend, it had been removed from roughly 90% of theatres. At just over $200 million, the worldwide gross is only about 1/5 the original's. It is estimated that it will lose the studio $150-200 million, making it one of the biggest box-office bombs of all time.

TedStixon

Trivia: In a surprising (and given the reception, highly questionable) move by Warner Bros, director Todd Phillips was given complete creative control over this film, including final cut, and no test screenings.

Phaneron

Continuity mistake: When the barber, towards the beginning of the movie, asks Arthur if he's got a joke for them, Joaquin Phoenix's face is cleaner from soap compared to the previous and following part of the scene - when it's thicker on the neck and goes all the way up on the cheekbone.

Sammo

More mistakes in Joker: Folie à Deux

Question: Why was this movie even made? Joker seemed to have been a complete story with no need to keep going, so why make a sequel?

Rob245

Answer: For the most part, it was likely down to the fact that the first film was a massive smash hit, grossing $1 billion on a budget of less than $70 million. There was simply too much financial incentive for the studio to not greenlight a sequel. The director also reportedly hated that the character, as portrayed in the first film, had become something of an "incel" poster boy and was idolised by part of the audience. So he wanted to make a sequel that tore down this notion by reaffirming that Arthur was just an unhinged, mentally ill weirdo.

TedStixon

More questions & answers from Joker: Folie à Deux