Question: Is this a prequel? The end confused me. How can part 5 characters be on flight 180 from part 1?
BaconIsMyBFF
13th Nov 2018
Final Destination 5 (2011)
30th May 2017
Final Destination 5 (2011)
Question: Throughout the whole film series, how is it that Bludsworth knows how to cheat Death and if the main characters are supposed to die, then why does he tell them how to do it?
Answer: Bludsworth's backstory has never been addressed in the series. He seems to have an intimate understanding of the supernatural nature of death but how he knows this is never explained. Why he gives the characters advice is also never explained, however he seems to be legitimately interested in whether or not the characters will succeed in cheating death because it seems to be impossible.
15th Jan 2018
Final Destination 5 (2011)
Question: Sam killed Peter at the end, so he got his life and he became safe. So how did he die on the plane?
Answer: In order to be "safe" you have to kill someone who didn't cheat death. Peter was one of the people who were supposed to die in the bridge collapse so killing him granted Sam nothing.
But you missed one point: Prior to being killed, Peter kills Agent block (someone who didn't cheat death) transferring agent's life on Peter. So Peter's life now in the judgment of 'death' should be effectively of someone who didn't cheat death. By extension, if Sam now kills Peter (who can now be deduced to be a clean soul from death's perspectives), Sam should get life of Peter, a person whose slate should be clean in the eyes of death. Why did Sam still die then?
Maybe the cop was supposed to die at the time of the plane blowing up.
The bullet from the gun was meant to kill the girl - he saved her so she dies on the plane, taking everyone down with her.
But by killing the cop, Peter had already paid off his debt to death. Then by killing Peter, Sam should have become safe.
Answer: Yes, it is a prequel to the original film.
BaconIsMyBFF