raywest

24th Mar 2025

Timecop (1994)

Question: In the fight at Walker's apartment, wouldn't the shoes worn by the guy with the taser ground him, making him immune to the shock that killed him?

Answer: Shoes do not guarantee protection from electrocution. Very thick rubber soles might be somewhat effective in certain situations, but regular shoes combined with water on the floor and being zapped with 50,000 volts is likely lethal.

raywest

22nd Jul 2023

Timecop (1994)

Question: It is revealed that same matter cannot occupy the same space. Walker carries his other self to safety after being knocked out. Wouldn't this break those rules?

Answer: At what point does Walker carry himself? Present day Walker is knocked out while outside the house. Future Walker kills the guy and then goes into the house. Unless you're talking about a deleted scene, future Walker never moves or touches present day Walker. Future Walker carries his wife to safety and lays her next to the knocked out Walker.

Bishop73

Answer: Technically, the two Walkers would not simultaneously share the same space just by touching. It was only when the older Walker forcefully shoved the two McCombs together that their bodies melded into each other, and both were destroyed.

raywest

13th Jan 2023

Timecop (1994)

Question: How can their house still be standing in 2004 when it was destroyed in 1994? Even if they rebuilt it it wouldn't look s old, it would only be a few years old.

Answer: The explosion did not happen because, by killing the younger McComb, Max prevented the timeline in which McComb planted the bomb. In the new timeline, Senator McComb mysteriously disappeared 10 years ago and was never heard from again.

Answer: In one of the flashbacks, it is shown that the wife designed the house and had been thinking about it for a long time. I think the easiest answer to this is: the house was simply rebuilt the same as it was.

oldbaldyone

Answer: My understanding was the timeline had been reset in such a way that the explosion had never happened.

raywest

Except that the explosion did happen. When Max carries Melissa out of the house to prevent her death again, their house is exploding in the background. This is because McComb had placed a bomb in the house to ensure that the explosion would kill Max which of course had ultimately failed.

The explosion happened, but it was before Max returned to his own time in the future. Once he went back through the time portal, everything somehow reset itself to before the bomb being detonated. The previous events in the past were erased in favor of an alternate timeline. The movie does not attempt to give a logical explanation, and it makes no sense, as most time-travel stories never do, but a "suspension of disbelief" is employed here. We're supposed to accept that it happened. Max is the only character who knows what the previous timeline was like, but he now has no idea of current events (like his wife and son being alive) in his alternate life during the intervening time from when he was in the past and returns to the "new" present.

raywest

20th Jul 2020

Timecop (1994)

Answer: She did remember him and what had happened.

raywest

13th Aug 2019

Timecop (1994)

Answer: McComb paid Fielding to do whatever he wanted her to do for him. She provides protection, follows his orders, passes on useful information about TEC, etc.

raywest