Ssiscool

15th Nov 2015

Saw VI (2009)

Corrected entry: Someone as high in the police rankings as Hoffman couldn't possibly set up all the elaborate traps as well as kidnap all the victims without noticeably neglecting his law enforcement duties. He rushes the main traps of this film into motion, but the engineering on them alone would take days if not weeks to accomplish.

Phaneron

Correction: Hoffman is following the Jigsaw case on it's own. No other work. There is plenty of time for him to kidnap the victims. As for the engineering part, we know he has been planning this for sometime as, as shown in other films, he's been working with Jigsaw from shortly after the events of Saw. So a few years.

Ssiscool

28th Feb 2011

Saw VI (2009)

Corrected entry: When William escapes his first test and lifts his shirt up to see what the enormous bloodstain is from, he finds the surgical stitched-up would on his side, with a single stream of blood beginning to seep off of it, and the rest of his side is perfectly clean. The size of the wound, and the small amount of blood on his side contradict the enormous blood-stain on his shirt. If he was losing enough blood to create a stain that big, there should have been more blood on his side, either from the wound, or from the saturated shirt rubbing it on him.

Correction: We don't know how long it was after the cut was made that William begins his tests. Therefore it's safe to assume that the blood is from when the cut was made. If it was long enough ago, the blood wouldn't rub onto him. The new stream of blood is where he has reopened the wound.

Ssiscool

7th Mar 2011

Saw VI (2009)

Corrected entry: When Hank (the janitor) is killed, we see his white under-shirt being stained red with blood. However, as the blood flows out and begins to soak into his blue overalls/shirt, his blue clothes don't stain properly. While his white shirt turns red, his blue clothes simply get wet as if soaking with water, but don't discolor at all from the red blood. This reveals some sort of fake blood was used, as it doesn't "stain" properly on his darker clothes, only on his white shirt.

Correction: I just watched this. If you lok carefully, the blood stains his darker clothers a darker red. You can't expect the same colour of redness on a blue shirt and a white shirt. The fact it just goes darker is correct.

Ssiscool

Join the mailing list

Separate from membership, this is to get updates about mistakes in recent releases. Addresses are not passed on to any third party, and are used solely for direct communication from this site. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Check out the mistake & trivia books, on Kindle and in paperback.