New mistake type: Anachronisms

Site discussion
Shouldn't there be a distinction between regular factual errors and anachronisms? I always liked the word and the type of mistake. Is it an option to make them a seperate mistake type?lionhead

Create a free account to be credited and vote on posts. In addition premium members get no adverts, and more benefits.

I can see how that would work as a separate mistake type. However most people wouldn't even know what that means.

1 month ago

Quantom X Premium member

Fair point.

1 month ago

lionhead

Join the mailing list

Addresses are not passed on to any third party, and are used solely for direct communication from this site. You can unsubscribe at any time.