<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
  <title>Mistakes in Father of the Bride Part II</title>
  <description>The top mistakes in Father of the Bride Part II</description>
  <link>http://www.moviemistakes.com/film463</link>
  <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
	<title>Mistake #1</title>
	<mistake_id>2872</mistake_id>
      <description>In the first movie, the wedding took place on January 6th. But in the opening sequence here the framed wedding invitation says &quot;October 9&quot;.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
	<title>Mistake #2</title>
	<mistake_id>12273</mistake_id>
      <description>In the first film, George refers to the tree that the family carved their names in as being in the front yard.  In the second film, this same tree is referred to as being in the backyard.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
	<title>Mistake #3</title>
	<mistake_id>2874</mistake_id>
      <description>Not really a mistake, but notice that the auditioning wedding singer from the first film and the foreign man that buys the Banks' house in the second film are the same man.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
	<title>Mistake #4</title>
	<mistake_id>27027</mistake_id>
      <description>In the scene where it's talking about the hottest summer the city's ever had (or something to that effect) some neighborhood kids are frying an egg on the sidewalk. The problem is, they're sitting and kneeling on that same sidewalk with their bare legs, and don't seem to be in any pain or discomfort.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
	<title>Mistake #5</title>
	<mistake_id>14624</mistake_id>
      <description>When George is holding his newborn baby and his grandchild, you can see that the babies are actually dolls and not actual babies.  I guess it made it easier for him to hold in some shots.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
