<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
  <title>Mistakes in Presumed Innocent</title>
  <description>The top mistakes in Presumed Innocent</description>
  <link>http://www.moviemistakes.com/film1009</link>
  <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
	<title>Mistake #1</title>
	<mistake_id>6068</mistake_id>
      <description>When the reporters surround Harrison Ford, there are no tapes in the tape recorders.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
	<title>Mistake #2</title>
	<mistake_id>102200</mistake_id>
      <description>When Harrison Ford returns to the crime scene to search for &quot;evidence&quot; we see blood stains on the carpet, which has been on the carpet for days. The blood is bright red and shows no signs of coagulation, but blood turns dark red when it coagulates after only a few hours.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
	<title>Mistake #3</title>
	<mistake_id>72103</mistake_id>
      <description>When Rusty is at the restaurant with his family, he is talking to his son. The son has a glass of milk in his hand and then immediately, he has a fork and knife. It alternates like this several times.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
	<title>Mistake #4</title>
	<mistake_id>47084</mistake_id>
      <description>Judge Lyttle holds several private discussions with the lawyers outside of chambers without having a court reporter present. A court reporter would always be present in such situations. The point of those private discussions is to prevent the jury from overhearing them, but they are still on the record.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
	<title>Mistake #5</title>
	<mistake_id>47085</mistake_id>
      <description>Tommy Molto stands up and tells Judge Lyttle that the prosecution has not been able to find a key piece of evidence: a bar glass found in the victim's apartment. The jury is present when Molto makes this statement. That would never happen in a real courtroom. The judge had not yet decided whether testimony about the glass could be offered by the prosecution, so he certainly would not want the jury to hear anything about the glass until AFTER he made that decision.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
