X

Great sites

Anything Hollywood

Atomic Popcorn

Banned in Hollywood

Bits & Pieces

Blockbuster Buzz

Book mistakes

CanMag

The Daily Column

Daily Stab

Defamer

Double Viking

EHOWA

The Evil Beet

Film Drunk

Filmofilia

Filmspotting

Foundry Music

Game mistakes

Geek Tyrant

Gone Hollywood

Hollyscoop

Hollywood Outbreak

I Am Bored

I Love Bacon

Joblo movie news

Movie Banter

Movie Buzz

Movie spoilers

Movie timeline

Other crap

Screenjunkies

Sky movie reviews

Something Really Funny

Tengossip

Trailer Addict

Unreality Magazine

Virtually Existing

Mistakes

When T. jumps through the rear window of Nick's van he falls on the street but rolls the wrong way, against any laws of physics. See more...

Trivia

When Martin Lawrence introduces Tim Robbins to his wife, he calls him "The Player", which is another of Tim Robbins' films. See more...

Mistake pictures

Movie Mistakes blog

Popular blog posts:

Top 15 biggest Harry Potter film mistakes

The biggest mistakes in the Harry Potter movies

15 biggest mistakes in Titanic

The 20 biggest Friends mistake pictures

10 Twilight mistakes in pictures

Nothing to Lose (1997) - 2 corrections

Directed by Steve Oedekerk, starring Martin Lawrence, Tim Robbins (add more)

Genres: Action, Adventure, Comedy, Crime

Comments made in brackets are corrections from other visitors. To submit your own corrections for mistakes, just click "edit" under an entry, then choose "correct entry". You can also submit corrections for corrections, if you think a mistake has been unfairly removed.

Mistakes
Trivia
Corrections
Submit
Nick and T. robbing a store at gunpoint for two flashlights (even that T. shoplifts two biker masks earlier) doesn't make sense as they had enough money from T's previous robbery. [Actually, they don't have the money that T stole from the previous robbery because Nick gave it to the gas station attendant for the $20 of gas, the shot gun, the phone that he ripped out of the wall and the sour fruity twist.]
Edit Time
When the tape of the robbery is being reviewed at the end of the movie, no one notices that the person dancing with fiery shoes is Nick. This means that it had to have been him or someone with him robbing. [I thought this as well, but the film never actually showed Nick's face while they are watching it, and besides that, they never had Nick in mind while they watched the film as the robber.]
Edit Corrected by T Poston