In the scene where Vassili is taking cover behind an old oven, Major König could've easily killed him. König's rifle ammunition would've easily gone straight through the oven and into Vassili's body, which is something a skilled marksman such as König would've known. [A: Vassily didn't know the specs of König's rifle or bullets. B: As an expert marksmean, König would know that you don't shoot through multi-layered objects to reach a target. It disrupts the path of the bullet and likely wouldn't have hit Vassily.]
Enemy at the Gates (2001) - 28 corrections
Directed by Jean-Jacques Annaud, starring Ed Harris, Joseph Fiennes, Jude Law, Rachel Weisz (add more)
Comments made in brackets are corrections from other visitors. As such, any aggressive/abusive corrections (and I get quite a few) written as if they're comments I've made myself will be ignored. To submit your own corrections for mistakes, just click the edit icon under an entry, then choose "correct entry". Some entries have "duplicated entry" after them - these are entries which were already listed on the main page, but were submitted again. I occasionally leave these online for a while, just in case they were moved in error, so don't worry about pointing them out to me.
In the scene where Vassili is taking cover behind an old oven, Major König could've easily killed him. König's rifle ammunition would've easily gone straight through the oven and into Vassili's body, which is something a skilled marksman such as König would've known. [A: Vassily didn't know the specs of König's rifle or bullets. B: As an expert marksmean, König would know that you don't shoot through multi-layered objects to reach a target. It disrupts the path of the bullet and likely wouldn't have hit Vassily.]
In the opening battle scene when the Russians are charging at the Germans, one Russian soldier is shot in the leg and then in the head. A few scenes later, the same clip is shown of the man being shot in the leg and then in the head. [First, as there are no inconsistencies between shots, this is not a continuity mistake. Second - already posted and corrected. Showing the same action from different angles during a frantic action montage is a common film technique.]
When Kulikov is shot on the run, we know the bullet goes through his head, because the blood flies out the side of his head and splatters on the wall. However, there is no bullet hole in the wall. It's very unlikely that a soft-nosed bullet would be used by any military in WWII, as bullets that are designed to expand are specifically banned by the Hague Convention, which even the Soviets and Germans tended to stick to. See: http://www.thegunzone.com/hague.html. [It's nothing to do with the softness of the slug. A bullet hitting bone can ricochet anywhere - it might have exited downwards through Kulikov's body, for instance. It might have hit the wall, and equally it might have hit the floor or the roof.]
In the shot where Kulikov is jumping across the gap between the two buildings and gets plugged in the head, pay attention because you actually see him get shot twice. One shot from the side show him get hit, and then an immediate close-up shows the hole appear again. [Showing the same piece of dramatic action (eg explosions or gunshot hits) twice from slightly different aspects is not a film mistake - it is a very common film technique.]
During the scene where Danilov is hiding under the corpses in the fountain, you can see one of the 'corpses' breathing. Just after the Germans have machine gunned the corpses, the shot cuts back to Danilov. A few seconds go by as he shifts the leg off his head. When the shot cuts to a view of Danilov from the side, watch the soldier who's coat flap is covering his mouth. As the camera starts to pan right, you can see the steam coming from this guy's mouth as he breaths. You may need slow motion. Watch for the steam on the jacket of the guy who's leg Danilov put over himself. [This has already been corrected - not all of the men die immediately. They are grievously wounded and doubtless will die, but while still alive, they'll be breathing.]
In the scene where Danilov is showing Zaitsev the article, he says that it will appear on the front page and be read "by people in the Crimea". Since the Crimea was under German occupation at the time of Stalingrad, Danilov would have known this would be impossible. [Unless they had an underground distribution network into German-occupied Russian territory. Quite likely, since we're talking about propaganda exhorting Russians to resist the fascists. Who better to exhort than people in occupied areas?]
When Vassily is invited to the old lady and the boy's house, the lady hears something, and blows the candle, but it's still light in the room for about a second after the light's out. [The reason the room remains lit is that it takes that second for the flame to be extinguished. She's blowing into a lamp that's nearly a foot tall - the flame wouldn't be extinguished instantaneously.]
In real life Vassili Zaitsev killed Major Konig by having someone hold a helmet over his head in an open window and Major Konig shot the helmet and the person holding the helmet screamed as if he was hit. Vassili saw the muzzle flash of Konig's rifle and shot him where he was hiding under a piece of sheet metal. (I guess one of the oldest tricks in the book still works) [In real life, it's highly unlikely this duel ever happened, suggest you read Stalingrad by Anthony Beevor or check this link http://www.russian-mosin-nagant.com/Zaitsev_story.htm.]
It's doubtful that the car Danilov rolls in the beginning is equiped with seat belts, but somehow he emerges from the wreck with nothing but a few scratches and a broken lens in his glasses, which haven't even fallen off. [We never see the inside of the car, so we have no way of knowing what steps he took to protect himself, or whether he had seat belts or not. As for the glasses, some time passes before he crawls out. He could easily have lost them, then recovered them and climbed out.]
In the map sequence showing Germany's takeover of European countries, Norway is not invaded. Norway and Denmark were invaded the 9th of April 1940... [It does not show the German advancement in true historical order, but more like a red shadow that expands across Europe in a steady pace. And just as the camera starts zooming in on Stalingrad, you can see a small sliver of red starting to spread on the south-eastern coast of Norway.]
Joseph Fiennes' character exposes himself to the Major's fire in the end to help Jude Law locate the Major. The Major shoots Fiennes and leaves his position and gets shot by Jude Law. During the whole film both of the opponents were portrayed as very sensible characters. The Major should have been alerted when he saw the head appearing so rapidly. The Major would have known that Law would never expose himself in such a stupid way and would have been conscious of a trap. [Koning often shoots anyone he can (even without a perfect shot) throughout the entire movie. It's clear he's not the type to waste chances, and there's nothing to suggest that he knew Vassili was there. In real life, Danilov was shot (albeit in the shoulder) which allowed Vassili and Kulikov to spot him. Then they raised a helmet for him to "kill" (which he also fell for) and he was shot in turn.]
Kulikov was shot down while jumping the building's gap. He was obviously holding his rifle. So how could Vassili give Kulikov's rifle to the girl? He went down to get it? Not too reasonable, with a sniper after him. [Vassili wouldn't have been able to move until long after nightfall, when he could be certain Major Koning's visibility was far too low for him to see Vassili. Vassili could have gotten it then.]
In the scene where Jude Law and Joseph Fiennes are going to meet Bob Hoskins' character, Law has a cut on his forehead. In one shot it has a plaster on it, then it is an open wound, then it has a plaster again. [If you look closely you can see the bandage there throughout the entire scene. The lighting just makes it hard to spot sometimes.]
When Vassily is ferried over the Volga into Stalingrad, the ships are being attacked by Ju-87D Stuka dive bombers. You can see one Stuka strafing the ships with wing-mounted machineguns. However, the Stuka's guns were mounted on top of the engine to fire through the propeller blades. The only exception would have been the Ju-87G with two wing-mounted 37mm cannons, but it entered service in 1944, 2 years too late. [No variant of the JU87 STUKA ever had guns fitted above the engines. The guns were only ever wing mounted, or in the rear gunners position. ]
The Russians were extremely notorious for destroying anything of value to the enemy during WW II, and major targets were train engines and railcars that couldn't be "saved." Those railcars in Stalingrad would be scrap by the time the Germans were within striking distance. [If you're referring to the beginning then they had only just arrived from miles away, so there's no reason for them to have been destroyed. And Stalingrad was being overrun fairly quickly at that point so the Russians might not have had time to destroy any railcars that appear later, especially since they were fighting to the death.]
In the beginning, when you see the people getting on and off the trains, there is a shot of a wagon with two gun turrets. You can clearly see the gun barrel bouncing up and down, revealing that it's made of plastic. [Putting aside that no one would build a gun turret (real or otherwise) out of plastic, they're on a train. Trains are not known for having a smooth ride.]
How come these supposedly "Russian" characters have British accents? Obviously it's because the actors are British, and for the sake of simplicity and American audiences, the majority of dialogue was written and performed in English. Even Bob Hoskins, a British actor, performs perfectly with a Russian accent; so why couldn't the others do this? [There have been umpteen incidents of 'wrong' accents in films (often involving Sean Connery), to the point where it cannot really be considered a film error - in many ways, it's better if an actor simply uses their natural accent rather than doing a really appalling version of the 'real' accent. Hoskins was obviously capable of pulling off a Russian accent - maybe the others weren't.]
You may also like: Saving Private Ryan | Black Hawk Down | 300 | Behind Enemy Lines | Gladiator




StumbleUpon
Slashdot
Facebook
Delicious
reddit